Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. District of Columbia
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 8, 2016No. 15-7098PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissenting opinion by Circuit Judge BROWN.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Following two warrantless searches of his home by members of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”), Matthew Corrigan sued the District of Columbia and individual MPD officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. He now appeals the grant of summary judgment to the defendants, *1025challenging the district court’s rulings that there was no constitutional violation and that the officers were entitled to qualified immunity.
Even assuming, without deciding, that…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lori Rodriguez v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Sherrod v. McHughCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Michael J. Daugherty & Labmd, Inc. v. SheerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Scott v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Pollard v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.