Legal Opinion
Christel v. AMR Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 20, 2002No. 1:00-cv-06496PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas Christel brought this action against defendants AMR Corporation (“AMR”), American Airlines, Inc. (“American Airlines”), American Eagle Airlines, Inc. (“American Eagle”), and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“Port Authority”), claiming that the decision by the Captain of American Eagle Flight 5149 to refuse plaintiff transportation and remove plaintiff from the plane was arbitrary and constituted a breach of the contract of carriage. In addition, plaintiff brought claims of malicious prosecution and/or abuse of process,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robert F. Williams v. Trans World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Sedigh v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Dunn v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Schaeffer v. CavalleroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Zervigon v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ruta v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Al-Qudhai'een v. America West Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Dasrath v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Xiaoyun "Lucy" Lu v. Airtran Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Dasrath v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.