Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Young

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2013No. Nos. 2011-IA-01763-SCT, 2011-IA-01783-SCTPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITCHENS, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of the defendant Vaughn, Bowden, PA’s (V & B) (f/k/a Vaughn, Bowden & Wooten, PA) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

¶ 2. The plaintiffs, Cherie Brott Black-more and Diane Young,1 sued their former employer, the law firm of V & B, as well as the individual partners, Eric Wooten, Ben Bowden, Tom Vaughn, and office administrator Debra Vaughn, for multiple claims regarding the presence of toxic mold in two of the offices in which the firm had worked.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. US Homecrafters, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rein v. Benchmark Const. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. DeversMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Pegues v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
  5. CHILDREN'S MEDICAL GROUP, PA v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Kristan Seibert v. Jackson County, Mississippi, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  2. Jones v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2013
  3. Cindy Petty v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  4. Hopson v. Chase Home Finance LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
  5. Craig v. City of Yazoo CityDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API