Jones v. First Mortgage Co. of Nevada, Ltd.

OPINION

Appellants (collectively referred to as “Jones”) challenge the entry of summary judgment on the ground that issues of material fact remain, making summary judgment improper. We agree and, therefore, reverse the order of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.

FACTS

In May of 1991, Jones was in need of a lender for permanent financing relating to several real estate development projects.1 *533Jones contacted respondent First Mortgage Company of Nevada, Ltd. (“First Mortgage”) to inquire about loans for the projects. First Mortgage told Jones that it could locate a…