Barker v. Bemidji Wood Products Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Certiorari on the relation of the defendant to review the order of the industrial commission awarding compensation to the plaintiff under the provisions of the compensation act. C. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 4261, et seq.
Thomas Barker, designated as plaintiff, owned a gasolene truck. He hauled timber products, principally jack pine bolts, to the plant of the Bemidji Wood Products Company, designated defendant, from a point 28 miles south of Bemidji. He received an injury through the crushing of a finger when unloading in the defendant’s plant at Bemidji. The only question is whether he was an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Ledoux v. JoncasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fox Park Timber Co. v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Texas Co. v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lindbery v. J. A. Danens & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Carter v. W. J. Dyer & Bro.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.