Legal Opinion

City of Nanticoke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 10, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

The City of Nanticoke (Employer) and the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund (SWIF) petition for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant Terry Ziolkowski’s (Claimant) claim petition. Claimant cross-petitions from an order of the Board that affirmed the WCJ’s denial of attorney’s fees.

On March 25, 1997, Claimant petitioned for benefits and alleged that he suffered a work-related injury on April 20, 1995, in the nature of “[cjoronary artery disease caused by high…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Kohut v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Weiss v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Gribble v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Scher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bell's Repair Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Delarosa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. T. Dolquist v. WCAB (City of New Castle)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API