City of Nanticoke v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McGINLEY.
The City of Nanticoke (Employer) and the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund (SWIF) petition for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) to grant Terry Ziolkowski’s (Claimant) claim petition. Claimant cross-petitions from an order of the Board that affirmed the WCJ’s denial of attorney’s fees.
On March 25, 1997, Claimant petitioned for benefits and alleged that he suffered a work-related injury on April 20, 1995, in the nature of “[cjoronary artery disease caused by high…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Kohut v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Weiss v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Gribble v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Scher v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bell's Repair Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Delarosa v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- T. Dolquist v. WCAB (City of New Castle)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020