Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided October 30, 1998No. ARMY 9700189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CARTER, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of intentionally inflicting an injury upon himself in a hostile fire pay zone, without intent to avoid service, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 354 days, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. This case is before the court for automatic review under Article 66, UCMJ.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. PaaluhiNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API