Legal Opinion
United States v. Ramos
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1958No. Crim. No. 45026PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAYFIEL, District Judge.
After a seven-day trial to a jury the defendants were convicted of conspiring to sell a narcotic drug, in violation of section 174 of Title 21, United States Code Annotated, and the defendants Di Buono and Ramos were, in addition, found guilty of three substantive counts charging them with the sale of narcotics, in violation of section 174, supra, and sections 4704(a) and 4705(a) of Title 26 thereof.
A timely notice of appeal was filed in this court in behalf of each of the defendants, and the fee therefor paid. The defendants thereafter moved in this Court under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. BucurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Carmelo SansoneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Frank Moia, and Leonard PerryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- People v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Joaquin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- United States v. TuckmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959