In the Matter of Eric Smith v. Richard A. Brown
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Chief Judge Lippman
(concurring in result). I cannot agree with the majority that the petition is untimely. I concur in the result as I also believe that the Appellate Division order should be reversed and the petition dismissed, but I reach that result on the merits.
The majority implicitly rejects respondent’s contention that the statute of limitations starts to run on the date the trial court declares a mistrial. Presumably they do so on the basis that the declaration of mistrial is not a “final and binding” decision to retry the defendant in the criminal case (CPLR 217 [1]; Matter of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edmead v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Enright v. SiedleckiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- MATTER OF TOWN OF HUNTINGTON v. New York State Div. of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rivera v. FiretogNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- MATTER OF HOLTZMAN v. MarrusNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.