Legal Opinion
Rochester v. Ingram
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 14, 1972No. Civ. A. 4265PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are eligible for public assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children Program (AFDC). This program was established by the Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. § 601 et seq., and has been adopted in Delaware. 31 Del.C. § 321 et seq. The defendants are Albert L. Ingram, Jr., Secretary of the Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, 31 Del.C. § 109, who has management and supervisory responsibilities of that Department, and John Hiland, the Director of the Division of Social Services in Delaware. On October 27, 1971, as a result…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rochester v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Budnicki v. BealDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mertz Ex Rel. Mertz v. HoustounDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Rochester v. BaganzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.