Legal Opinion

Mertz Ex Rel. Mertz v. Houstoun

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 30, 2001No. CIV.A. 01-2627PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

I.Introduction

Plaintiff has asserted claims for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She alleges that defendant has violated Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396 et seq., in determining her eligibility for Medicaid benefits. Plaintiff asserts federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Plaintiff seeks a declaration that defendant’s decision that plaintiff is ineligible for Medicaid until January 1, 2002 because of her husband’s purchase of annuities with joint assets in November 1999 is “illegal,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Carole Hughes v. John McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. F.K. v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services & Ocean County Board of Social ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Mackey v. Department of Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Gillmore v. Illinois Department of Human ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Morris v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API