Mertz Ex Rel. Mertz v. Houstoun
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
I.Introduction
Plaintiff has asserted claims for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She alleges that defendant has violated Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396 et seq., in determining her eligibility for Medicaid benefits. Plaintiff asserts federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Plaintiff seeks a declaration that defendant’s decision that plaintiff is ineligible for Medicaid until January 1, 2002 because of her husband’s purchase of annuities with joint assets in November 1999 is “illegal,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Carole Hughes v. John McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- F.K. v. Division of Medical Assistance & Health Services & Ocean County Board of Social ServicesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Mackey v. Department of Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gillmore v. Illinois Department of Human ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- Morris v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.