Legal Opinion

People v. Nance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 14, 1995No. Docket 168614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWahls, P.J.

Defendant appeals as of right from the trial court’s denial of his motion for reimbursement. We reverse.

Defendant was convicted of carrying a pistol in a motor vehicle. As part of his sentence, defendant was required to pay various fines and costs totaling $930. This Court, Reilly, P.J., and Mackenzie and Weaver, JJ., reversed defendant’s conviction in an unpublished memorandum opinion issued April 3, 1992 (Docket No. 131074). The Michigan Supreme Court denied the prosecution’s motion for leave to appeal. 441 Mich 868 (1992). The United States Supreme Court denied the prosecution’s petition…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MeyerowitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. ConnorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  4. State v. PiekkolaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. WattsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ArtmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. WallaceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. People of Michigan v. David Lamont CroskeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API