Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Newman Grove State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1933No. 28498PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an action to recover from the receiver of the Newman Grove State Bank the proceeds of an item sent to it for collection by the Central National Bank of Columbus. The item was collected and the collecting bank sent its draft for the proceeds, which was not paid because of the insolvency of the Newman Grove bank. The trial court held that the claim was a trust fund. This transaction took place between the 15th and the 17th days of July, 1929. Section 12, ch. 41, Laws 1929, commonly known as the uniform collection code, now section 62-1812, Comp. St. 1929, is not, therefore, applicable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  2. Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Milne v. Capital Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n v. MorrisNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Logan v. Farmers & Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API