Legal Opinion

Williams v. Nagel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 1993No. 4-92-0949PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCULLOUGH

Plaintiffs are three individuals who have been barred from entering a housing complex (complex) known as Parkside and Mansard Square Apartments in Champaign. Defendants are the management of the apartments (management), the owner of the complex (Nagel Group), the City of Champaign (City), and two individual Champaign police officers, Donald Hanna and Don Carter. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint sought damages for alleged violations of certain of their common law, statutory and constitutional rights. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted and plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Loyola Academy v. S & S Roof Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Balla v. Gambro, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Karow v. Student Inns, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Strata Marketing, Inc. v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  2. Anderson v. Financial Matters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Harper v. Missouri Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Williams v. NagelIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Doyle Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API