Legal Opinion
Budd v. Erie Lackawanna RR Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 24, 1967PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 N.J. Super. 47 (1967)
236 A.2d 143
PHILOMENA BUDD, GENERAL ADMINISTRATRIX AND ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM J. BUDD, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ERIE LACKAWANNA RAILROAD COMPANY, A NEW YORK CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 23, 1967.
Decided November 24, 1967.
Before Judges CONFORD, COLLESTER and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Arthur J. Blake argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne, attorneys).
Mr. Robert H. Wall argued the cause for respondent…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ToopsSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Kulbacki v. SobchinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Edward J. Russell v. City of WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
- Crego v. CarpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Kurak v. A.P. Green Refractories Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Zygmaniak v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. USANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.