Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Richman Brothers Company and Richman Brothers Madison, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 13, 1967No. 16159PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
National Labor Relations Board petitions pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e) for enforcement of its order compelling respondent Richman Brothers Company to bargain with the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO as the bargaining representative of the alteration room employees in respondent’s two Madison, Wisconsin, stores.
Respondent Richman Brothers Company manufactures and retails clothing in several states, and operates a store at 17 South Pinckney Street in Madison. Respondent Richman Brothers Madison, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Richman Brothers…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Brooks v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Clark-Sprague, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- National Labor Relations Board v. Clark-Sprague, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971