Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Stoddard

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1988No. 20198, 20210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Associate Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs appeal in case No. 20198 from a summary judgment granted them in this suit on a promissory note executed by defendants. They complain of the trial court’s refusal to award them attorney fees incurred in the collection of the note. Defendants appeal in case No. 20210, seeking reversal of the summary judgment.

This matter is before us for the second time. On a previous appeal by plaintiffs, we remanded the case to the trial court for a new trial. Dixon v. Stoddard, 627 P.2d 83 (Utah 1981). We refer the reader to our opinion in that case for a full…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Management Services Corp. v. Development AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dixon v. StoddardUtah Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saunders v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Sprouse v. JagerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. DaskalasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Red Cliffs Corner, LLC v. J.J. Hunan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  5. State ex rel. J.W.F.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API