Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1941No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Plaintiff, a seaman, sued on two causes of action: (1) pursuant to Section 33 of the Jones Act, 1 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. A. section 688, for damages for negligence; and (2) for maintenance and cure under the admiralty law. He declared for $100,000. The defense was that plaintiff had released his claims. The jury rendered a verdict, “$1,000 for maintenance, and $3,000 for pain, injury and wages.” Defendants moved for judgment n. o. v. and their motion was granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that plaintiff’s release was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Lloyd v. Victory Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. McNeil v. A/S HAVBORDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Howard v. Kawasaki Kisen K. K.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API