Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
Plaintiff, a seaman, sued on two causes of action: (1) pursuant to Section 33 of the Jones Act, 1 41 Stat. 1007, 46 U. S. C. A. section 688, for damages for negligence; and (2) for maintenance and cure under the admiralty law. He declared for $100,000. The defense was that plaintiff had released his claims. The jury rendered a verdict, “$1,000 for maintenance, and $3,000 for pain, injury and wages.” Defendants moved for judgment n. o. v. and their motion was granted on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that plaintiff’s release was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lloyd v. Victory Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- McNeil v. A/S HAVBORDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Howard v. Kawasaki Kisen K. K.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972