Legal Opinion

Trice v. Hulick

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 31, 2008No. 06 cv 6687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VIRGINIA M. KENDALL, District Judge.

Petitioner Calvin Trice (“Trice”) filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, wherein he complains that the trial court improperly admitted an anonymous 911 tape recording into evidence, the State used coerced testimony and withheld witness information, and his defense counsel rendered ineffective assistance at trial. Respondent Warden Donald Hulick (“Hulick”) moves to dismiss the petition as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A). On January 10, 2007, this Court questioned the timeliness…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. JacksonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  2. Martinez v. WillsDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API