Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of the Temporary Administrator of Moriarity

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to confirm referee’s report. Facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Varnum, S.

Motion..to confirm referee’s report. Matter heard by Judge Arnold, but not decided by him. The decedent was- in his lifetime in the furniture business and had as his manager in said business one McConville, 'to whom he paid a salary of $83 per week. Decedent’s will was contested, and after considerable controversy as to who should be appointed as temporary administrator, all parties consented and agreed, as a compromise, to the . appointment of decedent’s nephew, a legatee and executor under his will;. and McConville, the manager, jointly, and an order to that effect was made by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lent v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of McCordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of BraunsdorfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FroelichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  2. Russell v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  3. In re the Estate of Mart E.New York Surrogate's Court · 1906
  4. In re ClemensNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API