Legal Opinion

Spielfogel v. North River Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 27, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiff in a personal injury action brought against him by Fred Hill and Meta Hill, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered February 23, 1988, as, upon reargument, granted the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of the defendant’s obligation to defend the plaintiff in the personal *697injury action and to reimburse him for all legal fees and expenses reasonably incurred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Gillette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. International Paper Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Commercial Pipe & Supply Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  5. Allstate Insurance v. RiggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Park Place Entertainment Corp. v. Transcontinental InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Castracane v. Knights of ColumbusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. MugaveroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API