Legal Opinion

In re Merovich

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2016No. CASE NO. 1:14-bk-04623-RNOPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION1

Robert N. Opel, II, Bankruptcy Judge.

Pending before the Court is a Motion to Allow Debtor’s Counsel’s Fees as an Administrative Expense Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a)(2) and 503(b)(2) (“Motion”). The Chapter 13 case was dismissed, but I retained jurisdiction to consider the Motion. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is granted.

*645I. Jurisdiction

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B), (E), and (0).

II. Facts and Procedural History

A Voluntary Petition under Chapter 13 of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. ViegelahnSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. In Re: Barry L. Michael v.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. In Re LewisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Messner v. Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. In Re SzymczakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re FairnotUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  2. Brandon Humberto Estanol and Alexandria Paige EstanolUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2025
  3. Kevin A. ShermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Kufrovich v. DeHartDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API