Commonwealth v. Eberhardt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge:
Appellant was found guilty, following a non-jury trial, of Resisting Arrest 1 and placed on one year probation. On appeal, he raises two issues: (1) that the lower court erred in denying his motion for demurrer because the Commonwealth failed to prove an essential element of the crime, i.e., a lawful arrest, and (2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.
Because of our disposition of this case, we need only consider the second issue, concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. The test is whether, reading the evidence in the light most…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ContakosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. RaineySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MeoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SotoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. McDonaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LumpkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KarlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.