Padilla v. McDaniel
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
The petitioner alleges that he has been convicted of a criminal offense and imprisoned in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice. He has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus compelling the respondent judge to appoint counsel for him on his motion for forensic DNA testing. 1 At the time that he alleges that he filed his motion, a statute required the convicting court to appoint counsel. 2 Mandamus may lie to compel a district judge to follow the statute. 3 The threshold question is whether this court should be a court of first resort for such original actions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dickens v. Court of Appeals for the Second Supreme Judicial District of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth Supreme Judicial DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Lanford v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Neveu v. CulverCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Bush v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Ex Parte YbarraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- In re McCannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Simon v. LevarioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Powell v. HockerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.