Legal Opinion

James C. Winston v. Prudential Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 3, 1969No. 33013_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant shipowner seeking to re cover damages for personal injuries he claimed were caused when he was employed as an unlicensed Junior Engineer on defendant’s vessel. This alleged injury was a permanent loss of taste and smell. The plaintiff’s claim was that an exposure to hydrochloric acid fumes under circumstances demonstrating the shipowner’s negligence was the cause of the injury. 1 The only person competent to testify for plaintiff with reasonable medical certainty that the injury resulted from the exposure was the plaintiff’s medical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edward Davis v. United Fruit Company, Defendant-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. R. E. Peckham, Assignee and Trustee, Etc. v. Family Loan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. Frank A. Vitarelle v. The Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Outley v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Caussade v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Napolitano v. Compania Sud Americana De VaporesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Frederick Michelsen v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. Richard A. Peterson v. Term Taxi Inc. (Sued Herein as Terminal Taxi Inc.), John Diaz and Miriam HayesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API