Legal Opinion

Wade v. Wade

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 23, 2013No. 3D13-2354PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner S.L. Wade (“the Mother”) seeks the issuance of a writ of prohibition following an order denying, as legally insufficient, an initial motion for disqualification of the trial judge. The standard of review of a trial court’s determination on a motion to disqualify is de novo. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc., 565 So.2d 1332 (Fla.1990).

Having reviewed the petition and the response thereto, we conclude that the facts alleged in the motion to disqualify, which must be taken as true,1 “would create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Wade v. WadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Great American Insurance Co. of New York v. 2000 Island Boulevard Condominium Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Nguyen v. NguyenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  3. Sergio Alberto Castillo v. Marlen Castillo (Corrected)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Douglas M. Wyckoff v. Melissa K. Cavanaugh f/k/a Melissa K. WyckoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. CLAUDIO CINI v. ANGELA CABEZASDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API