Legal Opinion
Sergio Alberto Castillo v. Marlen Castillo (Corrected)
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 19, 2014No. 4D14-2522PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED OPINION
2Per curiam
We grant petitioner’s petition for writ of prohibition, based on his sworn allegation that the trial court failed to allow him to present argument or additional evidence prior to ruling on respondent’s motion for temporary support in this post-dissolution proceeding. We find that this allegation is sufficient to place a reasonably prudent person in fear of not receiving a fair hearing on his legal claims. See Keating v. State, 110 So.3d 538, 539-40 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); Wade v. Wade, 123 So.3d 697, 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). We direct this case to be reassigned to a successor…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Peterson v. AsklipiousDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Wade v. WadeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Keating v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Swida v. RaventosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4Cited by2 opinions
- IVAN DOMNIN v. OKSANA DOMNINADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Richard H. Partin, M.D., and Richard H. Partin, P.A. v. Solange Magalhaes, Paulo Magalhaes, and Omega Women's Center, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015