Legal Opinion

Maxum Indemnity Company v. Gribbins

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 27, 2019No. 3:13-cv-00804Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-00804-RGJ-RSE BROKEN SPOKE BAR & GRILL, LLC, ET Defendants AL. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Maxum Indemnity Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. [DE 62]. Briefing is complete [DE 78, DE 79] and this matter is ripe. For the reasons below, the Court will GRANT IN PART and DENY IN PART Maxum Indemnity Company’s Motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Maxum Indemnity Company (“Maxum”) issued…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API