Legal Opinion

Borgman v. Aikens

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1997No. 69A01-9611-CV-376PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this interlocutory appeal, we address the question of whether a party may initiate proceedings supplemental to execution on a federal court judgment in an Indiana court prior to domesticating 1 the federal judgment. We also discuss the time period in which a party must initiate an action to domesticate a judgment and enforce a judgment through execution.

FACTS

The facts in this case are largely undisputed. On January 18, 1985, appellees-plaintiffs David Aikens, Joseph J. Smith, Joseph S. Smith and the Estate of Mary E. Smith (hereinafter Smiths) obtained an agreed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Althaus v. Evansville Courier Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Hill v. BeghinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. National Mutual Insurance Co. v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Neal v. Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.N.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Morgan Asset Holding Corp. v. CoBank, ACBIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. City of Anderson v. WeatherfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Town of Plainfield v. Town of AvonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API