Borgman v. Aikens
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, we address the question of whether a party may initiate proceedings supplemental to execution on a federal court judgment in an Indiana court prior to domesticating 1 the federal judgment. We also discuss the time period in which a party must initiate an action to domesticate a judgment and enforce a judgment through execution.
FACTS
The facts in this case are largely undisputed. On January 18, 1985, appellees-plaintiffs David Aikens, Joseph J. Smith, Joseph S. Smith and the Estate of Mary E. Smith (hereinafter Smiths) obtained an agreed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hamlin v. StewardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Althaus v. Evansville Courier Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hill v. BeghinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- National Mutual Insurance Co. v. SparksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- City of New Haven v. ReichhartIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Neal v. Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of M.N.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Morgan Asset Holding Corp. v. CoBank, ACBIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Anderson v. WeatherfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Town of Plainfield v. Town of AvonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.