Beck v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their claim for declaratory relief. ORS 28.010; ORCP 21 A. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. The trial court granted the motion. We affirm.
The case concerns defendant City of Portland’s development plans for Marquam Hill and the North Macadam District of Portland. Plaintiffs own property on Gibbs Street in Portland. In September 2002, plaintiffs brought an action for a declaratory judgment, alleging, in part, that,
“[t]hrough Ordinance 176742 and related…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thunderbird Mobile Club, LLC v. City of WilsonvilleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Chernaik v. KitzhaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Moser v. MarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Nordbye v. BRCP/GM EllingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Petix v. GillinghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.