Davenport v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
This writ proceeding presents the question of whether a trial court must dismiss a petition to commit a person as a sexually violent predator (SVP) when the original SVP evaluations were prepared using an invalid protocol and replacement evaluations result in a split of opinion. We conclude the answer is no.
I. BACKGROUND1
While petitioner Roger Davenport was serving a term in a California state prison, prison officials referred him to the State Department of Mental Health (DMH) to determine if he met the criteria for commitment under the SVP Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Grier v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. Superior Court (Preciado)California Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re RonjeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reilly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. Aguilar CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013