Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 2012No. A131008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RIVERA, J.

This writ proceeding presents the question of whether a trial court must dismiss a petition to commit a person as a sexually violent predator (SVP) when the original SVP evaluations were prepared using an invalid protocol and replacement evaluations result in a split of opinion. We conclude the answer is no.

I. BACKGROUND1

While petitioner Roger Davenport was serving a term in a California state prison, prison officials referred him to the State Department of Mental Health (DMH) to determine if he met the criteria for commitment under the SVP Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Grier v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. People v. Superior Court (Preciado)California Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. In Re RonjeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. Aguilar CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API