Legal Opinion
Kops v. New York Telephone Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1978No. 77 Civ. 5271PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant, The New York Telephone Company (“the telephone company”) moves pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R.Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the motion is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed.
Plaintiffs Floyd J. Kops and John J. Keating are attorneys who operate a low profit, high volume legal clinic. During the second half of 1977, plaintiffs repeatedly requested that an advertisement concerning the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Selman v. Harvard Medical SchoolDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Levitch v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Holly v. Pennysaver Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- McIlwain v. Korbean Intern. Inv. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Weise v. Syracuse UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.