Legal Opinion

Holly v. Pennysaver Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 30, 1984PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

TlTONE, J. P.

Our concern on this appeal is with the construction of subdivision 13 of section 296 of the Executive Law, which provides, in pertinent part, that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice “for any person to discriminate against, boycott or blacklist, or to refuse to buy from, sell to or trade with, any person, because of the race, creed, color, national *571origin or sex of such person”. We hold that a refusal to distribute a free advertising circular in a predominantly black neighborhood is encompassed within the ambit of this statutory prohibition unless it is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Morone v. MoroneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Matherson v. MarchelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Green v. LeibowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Passalacqua v. BanatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Rotanelli v. MaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Scott v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API