Legal Opinion

DeMay v. Pine Township School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1946No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

In this workmen’s compensation case the sole question is whether or not the claimant’s employment was casual, aud not in the regular course of the business of the employer. The claimant was awarded compensation by the referee which was affirmed by the board and by the court of common pleas, and defendants appealed.

The defendant, Pine Township School District, is a municipal corporation, created by the School Code of 1911, whose sole duties are to “establish, equip, furnish and maintain a sufficient number of . . . public schools, ... to educate every person, residing in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. William Penn HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Goss Printing Press Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Dunlap v. Paradise CampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Parisi v. Freedom Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Deviney v. J. H. France Fire Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sones v. Thompson Furniture Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Iglesia v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API