Legal Opinion
Kryscnski v. Shenkin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 29, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 N.J. Super. 590 (1959)
148 A.2d 58
LOTTIE KRYSCNSKI AND WILLIAM KRYSCNSKI, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
STANLEY SHENKIN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WASHINGTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 26, 1959.
Decided January 29, 1959.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Lloyd L. Schroeder argued the cause for appellants.
Mr. Marvin Kosoff argued the cause for respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
Defen…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Sharrock v. KeansburgNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Borough of Paramus v. Ridgewood Park EstatesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Rodee v. LeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Burke v. Spring Lake Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tubular Service Corp. v. COMMR. STATE HIGHWAY DEPT.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Bove v. Bd. of Adjust. of Emerson BoroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Griffin Const. Corp. v. Bd. of Adjust. of TeaneckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Graves v. Bloomfield Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Lima & Sons, Inc. v. Borough of RamseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.