Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Carr

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 4, 1988No. Civ. A. No. CA3-87-2624-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FITZWATER, District Judge.

This civil action requires the court to interpret the term “parent” in 5 U.S.C. § 8705(a).

I

At the time of his death, Carl D. Curlee (“decedent”) was an employee of the U.S. Postal Service and an insured of plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”). Decedent died intestate, unmarried, and without children. He also failed to designate a beneficiary of his life insurance policy with Metropolitan.

The Metropolitan policy was issued under the Federal Group Life Insurance Program, pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Group…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Edward Manning, and Thomas Gaines, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Willie Brantley v. Edward J. Skeens, Guardian Ad Litem, Herbert Mathis v. Edward J. Skeens, Guardian Ad LitemCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  4. Mary Spearman v. Viva SpearmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Butler v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mall v. Atlantic Financial FederalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. BrowningDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API