Legal Opinion

State v. Gutierrez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1995No. 15391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

When is the constitutional privilege against compulsory self-incrimination self-executing; that is, when is a person’s answer to a question protected by the privilege even though the person did not invoke the privilege at the time? Or, to be more precise, when are the circumstances surrounding the asking of a question so inherently coercive that any answer is “compelled” in the constitutional sense? This appeal does not require us to provide a universal answer, but it raises the issue in an interesting context.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. His…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JAVIER M.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SerrosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. PonceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. ChavarriaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. BrownNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API