Legal Opinion

Durham v. Sachs Electric Company

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 23, 2020No. 5:18-cv-04506Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 WILLIAM DURHAM, et al., Case No. 18-cv-04506-BLF Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; v. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SACHS ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al., [Re: ECF 47, 53] Defendants. 7 8 This action arises out of Plaintiff William Durham and the proposed class members’ 9 employment by Defendant Sachs Electric Company (“Sachs”) at the California Flats Solar Project. 10 Now before the Court is Sachs’ motions for judgment on the pleadings…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API