Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Roach

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 7, 1996Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partColeman, J.

I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that there should be a remand to determine whether Roach’s sentence is unjustifiably disparate when compared with that of co-defendant Jackson. Ante at 233, 680 A.2d at 646.

*235I begin with the recognition that “[t]he paramount goal of sentencing reform [under the Code] was greater uniformity.” State v. Roth, 95 N.J. 334, 369, 471 A.2d 370 (1984).

State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627, 498 A.2d 1239 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1014, 106 S.Ct. 1193, 89 L.Ed.2d 308 (1986), sought to make sentencing uniform by requiring that the aggregate custodial sentence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. State v. GhertlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. State v. TysonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API