Liquid Carbonic Acid Manufacturing Co. v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Milam. Tried below before Hon. E. B. Pool.
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Chief Justice.
—Under the authority of Security Company v. Panhandle National Bank, 93 Texas, 575, the trial judge erred ;in reaching the conclusion that it was necessary for the appellant to show that it had a permit to do business in Texas before it could maintain this suit; but however, upon the main question involved in the case, the judgment must be affirmed.
It may be conceded that the superior title to the property in question -was in the appellant before the mortgages set out in the findings of fact were executed, but there was a delay upon the part of the appellant in forthwith…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Security Co. v. Panhandle National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by10 opinions
- Low v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Poland v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Cave v. Talley Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Denman v. KaplanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Watson v. WhittonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.