Legal Opinion

Albertini v. Linden

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1912No. 3,114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; Jeremiah J. Lynch, Judge. Action by Celeste Albertini against Peter Linden, doing business as the Oro Fino lee Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Cause submitted on briefs of counsel.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

A complete statement of the facts of this case will be found in the opinion upon the former appeal. (Albertini v. Linden, 43 Mont. 126, 115 Pac. 31.) The second trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff for the full amount claimed, and defendant has appealed.

*3991. It is urged that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict; but with this we do not agree. Plaintiff testified in his own behalf. He gave in detail the facts surrounding his employment and stated the terms of the contract without equivocation. The circumstances were all placed before the jury. There was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hefferlin v. KarlmanMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Leggat v. GerrickMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Albertini v. LindenMontana Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rousselle v. CramerMontana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API