Simplicity Manufacturing Company v. Quick Mfg., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the District Court holding valid and infringed claims 1, and 5 through 8 of Patent No. 2,903,007 granted Igor Kam-lukin 1 on September 8, 1959 for a soil tilling device. The parties will be referred to as Plaintiff and Defendant, respectively.
The Kamlukin Patent is a combination patent composed of admittedly well known elements which when combined provide for power reversing of a rotor-propelled soil tilling device. This device consists of a simple chassis or frame upon which is mounted a soil tilling rotor, a gasoline engine, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- H. K. Porter Company, Inc. v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1972
- Lee A. Turzillo v. P & Z Mergentime, Lee A. Turzillo v. P & Z MergentimeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.