Legal Opinion
Erber v. Hess
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 8, 2004No. 03-286PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*96SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be VACATED and REMANDED so that the court may modify its judgment in accordance with this Summary Order.
Familiarity by the parties is assumed as to the facts, the procedural context, and the specification of appellate issues. Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Erber brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, alleging deprivation of property without due process of law. On appeal, he challenges the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- John Stephen Larkin v. Patrick Savage, John Doe, John Rittenhouse, Charles Campisi, Anthony Cartusciello, and P.O. LodyzinskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Amaker v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Alexandre v. CortesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- People v. ErberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hunter v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014