Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 2018No. 2016-T-0099PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane V. Grendell, J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Danny Lee Hill, appeals the decisions of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas to deny his Motion for New Trial without hearing and to deny his Motion to Disqualify the Office of the Trumbull County Prosecutor. The issues before this court are whether a trial court may strike portions of a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence that exceeded the scope of the court's order granting leave to file the motion for new trial; whether the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case may be applied in analyzing the merits of a motion for new trial;…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Danny HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  2. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Eddie Lee Howard, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API