Legal Opinion

Womack v. Preach

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1946No. 4718PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

In their motion for rehearing, defendants call attention to our failure to discuss and pass upon the following questions which were, raised:

“1. May parents, the sole beneficiaries, recover damages for the death of their non sui juris child, expressly sent by them through a place of danger to perform a service for them, where the child in passing through the place of danger loses his life?
“2. Is a parent who makes a non sui juris child his agent or employee to perform a service responsible for the acts of omission and commission of such non sui juris child, which acts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Town of Flagstaff v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Von Saxe v. BarnettWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. De Amado v. FriedmanArizona Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Holmes v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BakerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sahf v. Lake Havasu City Ass'n for the Retarded & HandicappedCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Bush v. New Jersey & New York Transit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. Gibson v. BoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Lucas v. Mississippi Housing Authority No. 8Mississippi Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API