Legal Opinion
Huber & Huber Motor Express v. Martin's Adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 8, 1936PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court ¡by
Judge Richardson
— Affirming.
These actions were tried together in the circuit court and are presented to us as one, and we will dispose of them in one opinion.
The action of John Martin was to recover damages, for a personal injury sustained in the collision of trucks. That of Louis White, to recover damages to one of the trucks. The jury’s verdict was in favor of Martin for $1,500, and, White, $250.
Huber & Huber Motor Express has prosecuted an appeal from Martin’s and has entered a motion for an appeal as to White’s. As a ground for reversal, they contend that the court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Savings Life Insurance v. RiplingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Stacy v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Mullen & Haynes Co. v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Guthrie v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Rice v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lever Bros. Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950
- Webb v. Dixie-Ohio Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Lever Bros. Co. v. StapletonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1950
- Cheatham v. ChabalCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Hayes v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.