Legal Opinion
Davis v. Gonzales
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided August 25, 2006No. 6:06-cv-00108PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARDONE, District Judge.
On this day, the Court considered Respondents’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). For the reasons set forth herein, Respondents’ Motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
Remilkun Kayode Davis (“Petitioner”) failed to include a background section in his response to Respondents’ Motion. Accordingly, the following background section is taken from Respondents’ Motion.
Petitioner served on active duty in the United States Army and was then honorably discharged in August 2004. Resp’t’s Mot. 1. After his discharge, he was commissioned…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gutierrez-Soto v. SessionsDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
- Fuentes-De Canjura v. McAleenanDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- Williams v. SessionsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019