Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Holand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1965No. 39637PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This action arises out of an intersection collision between a pickup truck operated by defendant Vilhelm Holand and an automobile operated by defendant Erick Fagerholm in which plaintiff, Andrew Nelson, was a passenger. Plaintiff had a verdict against both defendants. After the court denied his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, defendant Fagerholm appealed from the judgment.

If all conflicts in the evidence are resolved in favor of the prevailing party below, the facts appear to be as follows: At about 6:30 a. m. on May 9, 1960,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Pluwak v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Norton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Dose v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Filas v. DaherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Brown v. Arthur Schuster, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Peterson v. RodekuhrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Brown v. Arthur Schuster, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Peterson v. RodekuhrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API