Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Phillips

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1966No. 280PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

Options “being unilateral in their inception are construed strictly in favor of the maker, because the other party is not bound to performance, and is under no obligation to buy. It is generally held that time is of the essence in such contract, and the conditions imposed must be performed in order to convert the right to buy into a contract for sale.” Carpenter v. Carpenter, 213 N.C. 36, 195 S.E. 5.

“Where an option stipulates a definite time for performance it is generally held that time is of the essence, and that payment or tender of the amount agreed within the time specified is necessary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. . CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Catawba Athletics, Inc. v. Newton Car Wash, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Sheppard v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Lentz v. LentzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. D. M. Wright Builders, Inc. v. BridgersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Eward v. KalnenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API