Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Goodwine

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1903No. 4,561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Warren Circuit Court; Joseph M. Rabb, Judge. Application by John Sexton for a license to sell intoxicating liquors. John C. Goodwine and others remonstrated. From a judgment denying the license, the applicant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

Application by appellant for a liquor license. The court found appellant, to be a fit person to be entrusted with such license, and that he gave the required notice of his intention to apply for a license at' the September term, 1901, of the board, commencing Septem*330her 2, 1901. Prior to August 30, 1901, remonstrances had been circulated and signed by 173 legal voters. The remonstrances were filed in the county auditor’s office on August 30, 1901, at 9 o’clock p. m. The total number of votes cast in the township for the highest office at the November election in 1900 was 332. Prior to the 30th…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Benson v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Sutherland v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Flynn v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Adams v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keeling v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Johnson v. KrocSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Ardery v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Flick v. SimpsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Flick v. SimpsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API